Christian Lacroix guest curates this year's Rencontres d'Arles photo festival


Why Christian Lacroix? I'll be the first to admit I had low expectations of this year's Rencontres d'Arles, given that a fashion designer not widely known for his close attention to photography had been chosen as its guest curator. In many respects I was wrong. Lacroix has, of course, worked with many photographers in the course of his career, but evidently his interest in the medium stretches much wider than professional association. And, given that the photography world has come in for a lot of self-scrutiny of late, anyone who can shed a little outside light on its treasures should be welcomed, right?

In fact, Lacroix's return as 'prodigal son' to the town where he was born and bred is a surprise success, and for perhaps the first time in its 40-year history, the townsfolk of Arles have embraced the festival as their own. For some that will be achievement enough, but for the international photography crowd, which descends during 'Professional Week' at the start of July, expectations are higher - especially as the Rencontres hasn't scored a real critical success since Martin Parr's stint as guest curator in 2004.

Many seemed determinedly unconvinced, but their worst fears - that 'Lacroix darling' and his entourage would overrun the festival with gaudy glamour - were not realised.

As the designer notes in the catalogue's foreword, 'Those expecting a "fashionista" festival will feel justifiably disappointed.' Yes, fashion imagery abounds, and the boy-from-Arles connection is milked to the max, but Lacroix is also generous and eclectic in his choice of exhibitions. Some of it, particularly work commissioned by the fashion industry through magazines and catwalk reportage, doesn't have much relevance beyond its original use, but mostly he's selected photography that transcends its commerial context.

There's space for old and new, with the big guns - including Richard Avedon, Peter Lindbergh and Paolo Roversi - shown together with relative newcomers, the most impressive of whom are Tim Walker and Gregoire Alexandre, whose work is more playfully inventive than their forebears. There are also some superb archive exhibitions, including one dedicated to the history of the fashion video, which showcases some wonderfully surreal footage from the 1960s commissioned by Dim Dam Dom, who gave early opportunities to upcoming directors such as Peter Knapp, as well as photographers like David Bailey and Jeanloup Sieff.

But what there isn't, which is surprising for a fashion designer, is any commitment to the 'now'. There's no sense that Lacroix has looked for the cutting edge in photography, if it exists, in search of the work we'll want to see more of in the future. And this highlights the problem with the Rencontres, which in recent years has seemed to find it difficult to balance populist shows that will benefit the town's tourist industry with the demands of the thousands of visitors who come during Professional Week to see something new.

It appears that the festival is increasingly split in two, with the blockbuster names shown alongside the big historical exhibitions in the old town where the tourists go, and the more contemporary work shown on the edge of Arles at the rejuvenated railway workshops, know as 'Les Ateliers'. And if plans to create a new culture park around the former SNCF sheds, based on designs drawn up by Frank Gehry and supported by the Arles-based LUMA Foundation, that distinction may prove sensible.

There's no obvious theme to Lacroix's selected exhibitions, but his fascination with dress as an expression of code and identity comes through, particularly in the first of the Ateliers, where Charles Freger's series on ceremonial guardsmen is displayed alongside Vanessa Winship's portraits of Turkish schoolgirls. They use a similar method, photographing their subjects in repeated formal poses, seemingly identical in their uniform clothing. Closer inspection reveals untold details through their emblematic embroideries, most evident in the military pomp of Freger's motif-laden liveries, but more subtly transposed in the 'sweet nothings' sewn into the girls' bodices captured by Winship.

Freger began his Empire series with the Royal Grenadier Guards at Wellington Barracks, continuing with the royalist garb of regiments in Norway, Belgium and Spain, together with the republican outfits of France, Greece and Portugal - uniforms that date back to Napoleonic times, an era of intense jingoism, war and nation-building in Western Europe. Although the guardsmen and women are shot encyclopaedically, in situ at their barracks in strictly prescribed poses denoting their symbolic functions, it's the faces that draw you in - vulnerable expressions that normally go unnoticed, sublimated by the histories and ideologies of the military heritage.

Winship's schoolgirls, shot in monochrome, seem to occupy a very different world from the colour and splendour of posturing army protocol, but they are no less proud to wear their uniforms. Captured on their way to class, sometimes for the first time, their dresses embroidered with lace, flowers and charming little messages are also emblematic of disputed territory. Photographed in the rural Eastern Anatolia fringes near the borders of Syria, Iraq and Iran, where Kurdish separatists continue their fight for greater independence, the uniforms symbolise the Turkish state. But this complex backdrop, and the obvious poverty of their lives, is almost irrelevant. They are simply and defiantly presented as children, photographed at an age when they remain largely unaffected by the mask of self-consciousness - their nervous grace before the camera more extraordinary than where they're from, what they do, and what they stand for.

Girls also are the subject of Achinto Bhadra's show next door, except these subjects have had their innocence taken from them in the cruelest circumstances. Working with 126 women and girls aged eight to 25, many of whom had survived rape, abuse and trafficking, the Indian photographer collaborated with a counsellor, Harleen Walia, to shoot studio portraits of divine characters invested with powers of redemption and revenge. Shot in a shelter run by Sanlaap, a Kolkata-based NGO, Walia spent months listening to their stories before helping them to create ideas for the imaginary beings photographed by Bhadra a means of expressing their hopes and anger, and ultimately provide 'a healing journey of psychological transformation'

On a lighter note, Jean-Christian Bourcart provides one of the surprise hits of the Rencontres with The most beautiful day of my life. Bourcart used to be a wedding photographer, and here he presents the pictures that 'found no buyers and lay yellowing in boxes'. No wonder. He employed every tacky trick in the book, from the classic miniature-bride-in-the-groom's-hands shot, captured in-camera, together with hilarious (and often quite creepy) double-exposures, along with some heavy use of Vaseline blur. 'A good wedding photograph is a photograph sold,' says Bourcart, who admits to building a collection of tens of thousands of these unsold images, which nonetheless serve as an effective document of their time, 'archetypes of the new proletariat - suburbanites' as he puts it.

These shows play off each other nicely, but elsewhere in the Ateliers it all feels a bit random. At best, Lacroix's appreciation for pure image-making ensures there's infinite variety, and space is given over to visual pleasure rather than the usual navel-gazing. But there's also plenty that's vacuous and self-indulgent. For example, Patrick Swirc's Letter to Claire - the photographer's grief-stricken ramblings to his ex-girlfriend - probably should have remained a personal matter. Caring isn't always sharing. There's also Joel Bartolomeo's video works, one of which is The Revolver. The artist first pulls newspaper stories of world catastrophes across the frame, then focuses the lens on himself in close-up, tears in his eyes, as he quotes philosophers on cruelty and injustice - all to the soundtrack to Nick Cave's The Weeping Song.

What's most disappointing, however, is that this Rencontres' 'Discovery Awards' are so weak. As in previous years, the Awards are there to provide that commitment I mentioned to new - or at least lesser known - world talents, showcasing 15 nominees with full-size exhibitions chosen by five selectors. It must have seemed like a good idea for the festival to choose five experts associated with fashion, but despite their impressive CVs, most seemed unable to think outside the box, offering up a rather dreary illustration of why photographs designed for the glossy pages so rarely translate into interesting wall space. So even Cameron Smith, a promising young Australian whose eye for an iconic fashion photo is clearly illustrated by this week's cover, looks out of depth here, whether that's through poor editing or simply because he doesn't have enough yet to carry a show.

Thankfully, one of the selectors - Elisabeth Biondi, visuals editor for The New Yorker - provides a notable exception, and tellingly none of her three photographers works in fashion.

The first, Debbie Fleming Caffery, is a 60-year-old American who, like Roger Ballen, creates a disquieting world of dark drama that is part documentary, part fiction. Set in the grounds of a church in a small Mexican village, Desire Overall takes its title from the people playing out a daily ritual of sin and forgiveness, focusing on the cantina-cum-brothel that continues its trade in the shadow of the local community's spiritual centre.

The second and third choices are very different. Many have photographed the New York subway, but Ethan Levitas has a different take, photographing the battered trains from nearby rooftops as they criss-cross Brooklyn to Manhattan. Each carriage becomes a single elongated frame, and within them he captures the casual poetry of street photography, catching travellers in momentary reflective glances.

Then there is Pieter Hugo, who recently featured in BJP (14 May) with his portraits of Nigerian street entertainers and their semi-domesticated animals. They are shown here alongside wild honey collectors from Ghana who cover themselves in leaves and branches to protect them from bee stings. Their outfits take on a decorative look, and so its entirely appropriate that he won this year's EUR25,000 Award - just as everyone predicted.

But there are some whose work surpasses the banalities of fashion magazines. Tim Walker and Gregoire Alexandre, who each have their own show at the Ateliers, both avoid the digital trickery now synonymous with the industry. Instead they seem to revel in the endless possibilities of the fashion moment, constructing fantasies that are tangible rather than hyperreal. Walker's pictures are reminiscent of fairy-tales, sumptuously staged in decrepit manor houses in the English countryside, while Alexandre turns everyday items into strange props.

Elsewhere, in the old town's Cloitre Saint-Trophime, there's a more radical take on fashion journalism. Richard Avedon's 26-page spread in The New Yorker, titled In memory of Mr and Mrs Comfort, marked a watershed moment in the career of a photographer who had partly made his name through fashion. Published in 1995, it served as his caustic farewell to fashion photography - a 'fable' starring an actress model and a skeleton that left no one in doubt about his thoughts on the vacuity of consumerism.

Less can be said of Peter Lindbergh, whose languid, sullen beauties seem terribly dated now. But there is a local connection. His exhibition features work that was photographed exclusively in Arles and nearby Beaduc, 'my favourite place on earth to shoot'.

Both he and Paolo Roversi helped to define a new, more naturalistic approach to glamour, but it is the Italian whose work fares better with time. Roversi's sparse Parisian studio is as much the star of his photographs as the models he shoots there - an empty stage to be filled.

Francois Hugier's Kommunalka is a welcome diversion from her usual fashion stories and tediously exoticised travelogues of Asia and Africa, which seem to remain wildly popular in France. Instead, she has created a moving installation based around communal apartments in St Petersburg, which despite slipping into some easy Soviet austerity chic, evokes a richly atmospheric portrait of place, using photographs film snippets and sound clips. Pierre Gonnard's portraits of people on the fringes of Spanish society, reminiscent of Velasquez, are equally redolent.

Lacroix has chosen to show two very different projects by Gregoire Korganow, including the backstage reportage of Paris fashion shows he shot for Marie Claire, which first attracted the designer's attention.

More interesting is his work on the families of France's 60,000 prison inmates, particularly his series on Marie-Christine, who stands for hours diligently waiting outside her husband's jail, staring for a sign that he can see her. She is captured standing in the same vantage point, anxiously looking for the telltale towel hung from his cell window. There is joy when she sees it, and despair when he is gone again - a simple and effective illustration of how the prisoners' partners and families are also punished for their actions.

A few of the archive shows are well worth attending too. At the Espace Van Gogh, alongside the fashion video retrospective already mentioned and a beautifully staged tribute to the 'look books' of Martin Margiela and Commes de Garcons (including iconic work by Nick Knight in collaboration with Peter Saville), there's an exhibition devoted to the copyright registration photograph. Madeleine Vionnet's successful campaign to protect couturiers' designs from being copied in the early 1920s gave rise to a form of photographic registration - capturing garments from the front, side and back - whose forensic simplicity appears beautiful in today's hindsight, and which contrasts with the contemporary emphasis of lifestyle allusions over the actual garments themselves.

Lastly, I'd like to mention a show that fell outside Lacroix's remit, staged at Galerie Vu's regular venue at the Capitole, which was the real find of the festival for me. Jeffrey Silverthorne isn't well known outside the US, despite creating an extraordinary body of work over the past 40 years, but that's changing since Copenhagen's Fotografisk Centre's recent retrospective. And now Vu is showing some of his early photographs of dead bodies and female impersonators, alongside more recent work that is more obviously staged, involving the photographer in set-ups with naked women. Each of his photos, whether documentary or not, have a sense of ambiguous unease about them, reminiscent of Diane Arbus, whom he knew well.

Despite enjoying Lacroix's Rencontres, I would have liked to have made more such discoveries. The festival, though well worth a visit (shows run until mid-September), needs to bounce back with a sustained commitment to new work and exclusive premieres. Next year's 40th anniversary may provide more temptation to look back on past glories, but if the festival is going to remain relevant to the photographers, critics and curators who travel to Arles from all over the world during Professional Week, it needs to address this issue, quickly.

Exhibitions at the Rencontres d'Arles continue until 14 September. Visit here

Photographer alert! #Update

Cynthia Turner of the Illustrators' Partnership has contacted me with this link with a sample letter for non-US visual creators who oppose the orphan works proposals detailed in my earlier post. It's important action is taken now – before it's too late.

The National Gallery Photographic Portrait Prize 2008 is now open for entries



Last year's winner: Joseline Ingabire with her daughter Leah Batamuliza, Rwanda from the series Intended Consequences: Mothers of Genocide, Children of Rape by Jonathan Torgovnik © the artist

The international prize, now sponsored by European law firm Taylor Wessing, comes with a £12,000 cash reward for the overall winner. It will also include the Godfrey Argent Award, presented for the best portrait taken by a photographer aged 18 and 25. In addition the judges can award additional cash prizes to the shortlisted photographers.

The winning images will be featured in a three-month exhibition at the National Portrait Gallery, which will tour to two further cities in the UK in 2009.

The closing date for entry is 25 July. Photographers can enter by post or in person by contacting the London College of Communication. They can also submit their entry forms online before 20 July, but the images will still have to be sent in or delivered in person to LCC.

Photographers must pay a registration fee of £16 for each photograph entered.

For entry details, visit here.

Can I just add that the Prize in its various guises has become a little jaded in that so many of the shortlisted photographs look the same; ie straight, blank-faced portraits and images of children on the cusp of adulthood. Given that the judges are different every year, I suspect that photographers are trying to anticipate their taste by entering images that look like previous winners. This is a mistake. Have the courage of your convictions and enter your best work. I know many of the judges in previous years have tired of this 'house style'.


Here's the opinion of one of last year's judges, Sue Steward, which we published in BJP:

"It's derided as much as it's celebrated, but NPG's annual photography contest certainly gets people talking about portraiture. Writer and broadcaster Sue Steward, one of this year's judges, reflects

Before my invitation to be a juror in the National Portrait Gallery's annual Photographic Portrait Prize, my split-second editing decisions had been confined to sheets of transparencies and scrolled screens of digital images. That could be nail-bitingly difficult enough with an editor waiting to see a selection, a deadline approaching, and a couple of images vying for my eye - but the prospect of short-listing from 7000 printed images to 60 exhibitors in two days, then slashing them to five winners who might very well see their careers transformed, was a monumental task carrying huge responsibility.

But the NPG is well practised in this annual ritual and has a fantastically efficient system in place. The experience resembles a theatrical performance, as if a revolving stage was propelling the handlers - wearing black outfits and white gloves like mime artists - past the gaze of the five jurors perched on chairs in front of them. We could stop the carousel, ask to see an image close-to or pulled back for a longer view, or simply signal, 'No! please, take it away!' (There were plenty of those, and surprisingly pretty much always unanimous; excluding them sped up the process, especially if they were part of a set of six images, the maximum any photographer could submit.)

Many things about this process were unusual. We had only the image and the title if we asked for it, as background information, and were therefore detached from any usual clues and contextual information, which come into play when editing.

A familiar name carries a reputation, a history and a body of work for reference; a lesser name or an unknown will slot into some kind of amorphous context. But a place-name in the title introduces a wealth of clues, and that happened with several images, including two of this year's winners.

Not only is Jonathan Torgovnik's Josephine Ingabire with her daughter, Leah, Batamauliza, Rwanda (above), a profoundly expressive portrait of three women, one older and two young - which we all silently thought in an instant would pass to the finals - its title revealed their location was Rwanda. That, combined with the anguished expression of the older woman and blank looks of the two girls, conjured the country's recent, brutal history and confirmed that it is no travelogue portrait of photogenic Africans. But it is highly photogenic, and that contributed to it winning the overall 2007 prize: the colours and composition, the contrasting sandy earth tones and mud houses with the women's dark skins and bright, dyed dresses, is perfectly beautiful.

>

In a similar way, the scene immortalised by the Godfrey Argent Award (Under 25s) winner, Ivor Prickett's Slavica feeds her baby son Nikola while her husband Nebojsa sleeps (above) suggests displaced persons, and their names, the ravages of the Bosnian-Serbian war. The calm of this preserved moment becomes a universal representation for the displacement currently experienced by millions of women who have to feed their babies in temporary housing far from their homes (and very often not as comfortable as this).

Like Torgovnik's subjects, they arouse an emotional response and a curiosity, but the work is also a model of composition, involving a painterly palette and lighting reminiscent of the Dutch school.

I single out these two images not just because they are winners but because they represent a fading 20th century tradition of emotive, visually stunning, educational photojournalism in the Magnum Photos tradition. The relatively recent switch from classic monochrome to high quality, gloss colour - which is now almost universal within portrait photography - is being explored by new, younger members with a post-modernist approach moving towards abstraction and playing down the narrative or political, which were part of documentary photography's calling card. The new approach is heavily represented in the NPG show and reflects the aesthetics of our narcissistic, photo-dominated environment, with photographic instruments in virtually every household.

Casual family snapping has become an art form, practised on sophisticated professional equipment. It has elevated the domestic environment to studio status. That was, of course, reflected in the submissions, and tested our interest and tolerance for the mundane or unattractive, or as we gawped at young couples lying on sofas with the dog, young single women in bedrooms posing knowingly like a Heat celeb, in the glare of a flash - images which could have been pulled from a thousand mobile phones, MyPhoto folders or YouTube sites. But there are some marvellous representations of this style hanging in the show.

Most interesting to me were the people labelled as 'eccentrics' who live surrounded by clutter and chaos, who haven't fallen for universal consumerism and uniformity of decor, and whose 'stuff' reveals obsessions, passions - and implies rich interior worlds. Similarly, portraits of people in late life (and I admit a personal obsession here as someone who spends much time sitting, watching, eavesdropping, observing very old people in my mother's care home) - people who represent a huge swathe of the population but who found little representation.

Youthful skins still sell, though last year's selection included the septo-and nono-genarian pioneers of British photo-reportage, Grace Robertson and Thurston Hopkins, posed by Kenneth Griffiths against a vivid hydrangea, which garlanded them for their status in British photographic history. I regretted not fighting harder for the portrait of a dignified old man shot in profile, a sharp, alert expression, and a head packed with life stories, if we were to ask. But of course, that's the name of the judging game.

We all emerged from the judging possessed by faces and features that inevitably included many that wouldn't reach the public gaze.

At the other end of the scale is the current preoccupation of photographers with pre- and post-teenaged children - particularly girls. To an extent, my antipathy to this domination of the submitted images and prevalence in portrait photography must be connected to my own lack of teenaged children and absorption in their complex and fascinating journey. But the current orthodoxy of deadpan, listless, unsmiling girls, doesn't chime with the reality of this fiery, volatile time of life. Thankfully, many photographers who develop this line also succeed in adding a depth to their subjects. This seems to have developed into a kind of orthodoxy, which is self-perpetuating, and leads contestants to pose children and friends in domestic situations, simply because that is what appears to appeal each year....



Michelle Sank's example of what she calls 'compassionate portraiture' shows Janine (above), tall, proud but vulnerable, her outstretched arm displaying the criss-cross scars of a self-harmer. It is a powerful representation of a habit utterly of this time, and deserving of documentation, but also teetering on the edge of exhibitionism in the context of an art institution rather than a campaigning image for a charity. Julieta Sans' portrait of Lucila, a.m. (below) - oblivious (or feigning it) to the camera, engrossed in reading - is a wonderful photograph: everyday, certainly, but intriguingly raising the obvious question about the visible patch of underwear. Did she realise? Was it a collusion between photographer and subject?



With virtually every household possessing their own camera, what is the function of the portrait photograph today? Editorial photographers are still necessary for conveying non-verbal information about the story's subject, but paparazzi shots often replace them because they reveal more of lifestyle than the character of crafted studio shots probing the subject.

I have great respect for editorial photographers given five minutes to create something original with a Hollywood starlet or pop icon in a hotel room (unlike Annie Liebowitz's leisurely time-scale). And such photographers are now just one of a team, with make-up artists, stylists and designers. Thankfully, there is still an occasional place for a Pyke/Avedon/Bailey style black-and-white, pores-and-all head shot like the studied John Hurt image (by Nadav Kander) in this year's exhibition, but most editorial portraits are now following the less is more line.

The digital revolution enables perfection, in colour and reality, and is partly responsible for a uniformity of technical quality and rich colours. Many photographers do, of course, subvert this perfection, because after a while, perfection is boring. At the end of two days I was wishing for more of William Klein's out-of-focus studies, or Antoine D'Agata's flirtation with abstraction. And then I was jolted by the Tate's recent request for photographs depicting Britain today, in response to Tate Britain's magnificent How We Are sweep of a century of photography.

From more than 8000 digitally submitted photographs, the final set revealed a set of imaginative, technically diverse, fresh and refreshing scenes, with barely a reference to the 'deadpan' style or advertising gloss referred to above. Did these photographers come from a section of the population that would have been intimidated, unaware of, or simply not interested in being part of an art institution's prestigious show? Several images would have taken my vote, but it was the representation of youth that struck me: Teenagers at the Underage Club, Elephant & Castle by Grace Pattison, 25, perfectly sums up the awkwardness and ambiguity that teenagers exude while trying to look cool. Pattison disembodies the girls' and boys' legs - like a shoe ad - and tells the story through the positions and angles of feet in high-heels and trainers. In contrast, Enjoy the Stormy Weather, by Tung-Shen Hsie, shot on a windy Blackpool promenade, is a dynamic encounter between cowboy-hatted hens trying to fix their halos and being helped by an old man passing by. It lacks Martin Parr's cynicism and, shot in black-and-white, possesses an ordinariness, but it is absolutely of this time. Both images serve as fine representations of the social habits of Britain's dynamic youth, and fit perfectly alongside the mastery of the 'deadpan' and 'compassionate' that are in danger of becoming cliched.

A case of more creative chaos needed."

Photographer alert! Proposed "orphan works" copyright legislation in the US would tear up long standing world accord

A US committee has approved a controversial 'orphan works' copyright bill, bringing it one step closer to becoming law.

The US House of Representatives Subcommittee on the Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property approved the Orphan Works Act of 2008 (bill HR 5889) on 07 May, meaning that it can now be presented to the House of Representatives for a vote. If passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and approved by the President, the bill will become law.

The bill would allow anyone to legitimately use orphan images - those for whom the author or copyright winner cannot be traced - providing they had put 'diligent effort' into finding the rightful owner. Orphan image-users would be required to file a 'notice of use' with the US Copyright Office, including their name, a description of the intended uses, a description of the work, a summary of the search conducted and all identifying, information found during this search. The Copyright Office would then maintain a database of these notices.

The bill is unlikely to reach the House for a vote before the end of 2008, however, because although the House is sitting in June and July, it will adjourn for one month on 11 August. It will then reconvene for only two weeks in September before retiring until the presidential and legislative elections in November. This schedule leaves less than three months for the bill to pass this year.

US photographers' organisations are divided over the bill, with some now resigned to it while others continue to object. The American Society of Media Photographers, for example, states that the bill is 'about as good as photographers are ever going to get', while the National Press Photographers Association and The Advertising Photographers of America are calling for it to be amended.

NPPA president Tony Overman has written to congressman Howard Berman, who introduced the bill, urging him to change it. 'We cannot in good conscience support this bill,' he stated. 'We recognise the difficulties of managing rights for historical images. We believe a carefully and narrowly tailored expansion of the fair use exception to the Copyright Act would address the legitimate concerns of librarians, historians and educators.

'Therefore, on behalf of our board and 10,000 photojournalists, students and editors throughout the country, I urge you to consider the significant economic and artistic harm this draft legislation could cause and amend it so that it: minimises potential abuse; balances the needs of those who legitimately seek orphan works exemptions; and offers greater protection those who seek to protect their copyrights.'

The Advertising Photographers of America group, meanwhile, says that the bill could put thousands of photographers out of business. 'The legislation offered does not achieve the goal as we believe was originally intended, and instead provides a distinct road map for the infringement of contemporary works by living artists worldwide,' it states. 'If left unchanged, this legislation has the potential to destroy the businesses and livelihoods of thousands of photographers, other visual artists, as well as the collateral small businesses that serve the industry, and are dependent on, creators.'

Photographers outside the US can only watch from the sidelines, although they will arguably be worst affected if the bill becomes law because action against copyright infringers could only be taken in US courts - something too expensive and time-consuming for most to consider.

The World Intellectual Property Organisation (a United Nations agency), and some European countries are considering similar legislation. Germany, Hungary and Denmark, in particular, are said to be keen to introduce new rules governing orphan works in the near future.

His images turned the world on to West Coast Modernism: a profile of Julius Shulman, the father of architectural photography


Kaufmann House, Palm Springs, 1947
Architect: Richard Neutra
Picture (c) Julius Shulman


'Put your camera down. Don't act like a photographer; instead, act like a human being reviewing a piece of sculpture and understand where you would like the light to be for your exposure.'


Despite celebrating his 97th birthday last October, America's most prolific architectural photographer is busier than ever. Modernism is back in vogue, and no one captured it better than Julius Shulman.

In his prime, he did more than anyone else - architects included - to sell the laid-back glamour of the West Coast style to the rest of the world. The Los Angeles shooter's sumptuous images of luxurious, minimalist cool sum up the relaxed, easy-going optimism of the period, when the US emerged confident from the shadow of Europe to embrace its own identity. For the privileged few, sat around turquoise-clear pools high in the hills overlooking the arid Southwest, this was a time of unparalleled and conspicuous consumption. Indeed, they never had it so good.

Since the mid-1930s, when he began his professional career after a chance encounter, Shulman has completed more than 8000 commissions, photographing the key buildings by the leading American-based architects of the 20th Century, including Frank Lloyd Wright, Mies Van de Rohe, Pierre Koenig, Richard Neutra, Oscar Niemeyer and countless others - some of whom would have lapsed from memory were it not for his all-embracing archive. His photographs became the public face of the private buildings they designed, away from the city sprawl.

Two weeks after returning home from college - flirting with the idea of becoming a gardener, having never graduated - Shulman's sister introduced him to a friend who was working for Richard Neutra, one of the leading figures among a new generation of emigre architects working in California before the War. 'I had gone to university for seven years and never majored in any subject,' he recalled when I spoke to him shortly after his 90th birthday. 'It was in a period of hiatus in my life. I didn't know what I wanted to do. I didn't know anything about photography to speak of, and I knew nothing of architecture. When I came back from Berkeley to Los Angeles I was simply passing time as if I was ordained to wait those seven years.

'Two weeks after I came home, I met this young man who worked with Neutra. I didn't know who Neutra was or that he was then the foremost architect in the world, but I was invited by this young man to go with him to see this particular house that was being finished. He was going to inspect the house with a contractor, and while he was there I wandered around the exterior with my little Kodak Vest Pocket 127-format camera and took six pictures. Whatever he was practicing in terms of the International Style of architecture didn't mean anything to me until later years when I became familiar with what I was doing. When I took those original pictures I didn't know what I was photographing. I was simply taken by its simplicity and its disciplined design.'

Shulman showed the prints he made to the friend, who passed them on to Neutra, and, on 05 March 1936 - a date indelibly stamped on Shulman's memory - the architect called to set up a meeting. It was the day that he became a photographer. Neutra commissioned more pictures and introduced him to colleagues - Raphael Soriano, Rudolf Schindler, Gregory Ain and others - soon establishing him as the photographer of choice.

Shulman was quite definitely in the right place at the right time. For a start, there were no architectural photographers in LA at the time. Commercial photo-graphers took up building commissions, and Shulman felt that their images were not 'art-like.'

This was also the great boom time for building in California and, as the US emerged from the shadow of World War II as a true superpower, there was a common desire to shake off European shackles and create a style adapted to the new American way of life. Shulman found himself working amongst a group of architects who would soon be at the centre of the world stage.

'His success in translating the three-dimensional spaces of architecture to the two-dimensional space of photography earned him a reputation far beyond Los Angeles,' writes Philip Ethington in the forward to a huge new three-volume book, published by Taschen. 'His client list was starting to become a "who's who" of every great architect of the 20th century. In fact, Shulman was one of the inventors of architectural photography. Until the 1930s, architects usually took their own photographs, or commissioned unspecialised photographers to do so.'

Perhaps the fact that Shulman never formally trained as an architectural photographer enabled him to forge his own distinct approach. He simply seemed to 'get' it - both the technicalities and the actual essence of the buildings themselves. He had, of course, already moved on from the Kodak snapper, using first an Eastman View camera, then a Sinar system and then a Horseman, teaching himself on his own 'field trips'. But, it was his self-taught mastery of lighting that helped him achieve his complicated compositions, combining interiors and exteriors, and often a field of focus stretching from a few feet to 20 miles. He seemed to always know when the decisive moment - using carefully prepared lighting and natural daylight - would combine to most dramatic effect.

'The secret to the success of my photography is to always create a proper balance of light,' says the photographer in the introduction to his classic 1962 textbook, Photographing Architecture and Interiors. 'Put your camera down. Don't act like a photographer; instead, act like a human being reviewing a piece of sculpture and understand where you would like the light to be for your exposure.'

Shulman also had an instinctive appreciation of the new architecture, in which the surrounding landscape became the living room wall, and where the divide between inside and outside was blurred by glass, water and vegetation. Having first grown up on a farm in Connecticut, he has carried an abiding love of nature throughout his life - backpacking and skiing in to his late eighties - which is always evident in his images. Shulman made the landscape and the natural elements integral in his images, accentuating the buildings' drama and their purpose. Unusually, he often used people in the pictures too - models, friends, inhabitants - all of which was crucial to making the new style of architecture appear both elegant and appealing, rather than radical and severe.

He can't understand why photographers still insist on shooting empty buildings, and shortly before speaking to me, he wrote to the Los Angeles chapter of the American Institute of Architecture, remarking on the pictures from its recent awards programme. 'There was page after page of award winners and not one person. I thought architecture was for the people. They make all kind of excuses: they don't have the time; they can't be bothered; the technical problems ...'

In his heyday, Schulman dominated the market, employing assistants and lab technicians to fulfill an assignment a day, supplying not just architectural magazines, but titles such as Life, Time, House & Garden and Look, who regularly devoted spreads to his images depicting a new way of life.



Perhaps his most enduring photographs, shot free-of-charge, are of the Case Study House Program (1945-62), which aimed to demonstrate the principles of Modernism and their sustainability for low cost housing, using the latest hi-tech materials. And if one photograph has become his signature image, it is Pierre Koenig's Case Study house #22, 1960 (also known as the Stahl Residence, seen above – there's an interview about how he set it up here), which is said to be the world's most published architectural image. Featuring only a detail from the building, with two women chatting in a corner, seated overlooking downtown LA in dramatic backdrop, it is a perfect example of his combination of instinct and preparation.

He had asked two friends of his assistant to be at hand, if needed, to make the house appear inhabited. 'At one point in the early evening I was setting up inside. I walked outside, and the two girls just happened to be sitting in that corner of the house. I brought my camera outside and immediately set up the composition.' He opened up the camera lens for several minutes - judging the exposure without a light meter - to let in the scene below. 'At a certain moment I called to the girls. "Sit up" and then to my assistant, "Turn on the ceiling lights"' - firing the flashbulbs mounted behind his camera and capturing the whole scene in one shot.'

Benedict Taschen, the publisher of many of his recent books, dubbed him 'One Shot Schulman' for this uncanny ability to judge the light and composition perfectly and get his shot first time. 'That essence comes naturally,' admits the photographer, who after a brief retirement from shooting in the mid-1980s to concentrate on managing his archive, is now back working on assignments. Since teaming up with German photographer Juergen Nogai in 2000, the pair have completed more than 70 commissions. Meanwhile, he has transferred his archive of 250,000 prints, slides and negatives to the Getty Research Institute for the History of the Arts and the Humanities (the cataloguing of which has taken four years and is due to be completed in 2008), and set he set up the Julius Shulman Institute, dedicated 'to the potentials of brilliance' in high school students.

Shulman, the son of Russian-born Jewish immigrants, born on '10-10-10', has become an American institution. And he's more popular than ever: Modernism Rediscovered is merely the latest - and most comprehensive - of a dozen books featuring his work in the past decade. 'The public is now realising that Modernism is actually a way of life,' says the man whose home and studio remains the Soriano-built steel-and-glass structure created for him in the Hollywood Hills in 1950.

'Photographers bear a responsibility,' Shulman once wrote. 'We create a structure's role in the history of architecture.' Now, he himself is a central pillar in that history.

Taschen has published a massive three-volume book of the photographer's work shot over seven decades, Julius Shulman: Modernism Rediscovered, (ISBN: 79838 2284 2874) priced £200.

British editorial photography and the demise of the photo editor

“British editorial photography is really an exercise in page filling. What’s important are the ad pages, as always.”


It already generated a lot of discussion when first posted at APE but here's an absolutely dynamite interview highlighting the sorry state of British magazines and the declining power of the photo editor.

It began as a conversation between New York shooter Andrew Hetherington – who is Irish and knows the UK editorial market well – and Chris Floyd, who returned to London after six years in New York. Floyd articulates something I've been thinking a lot about lately reading APE – how come struggling UK photo editors work so differently from their US counterparts, matching new talent with established shooters?

The answer is that most weekly weekend magazines are run with two staff and an intern, where as the US monthlies work with two or three times that staff and far better budgets. I know a few of the UK magazine photo editors, and most are passionate about their work, but seem completely powerless to put their knowledge and expertise into effect. And having once had a run in with Sunday Times Magazine's editor, I felt he was almost delusional in his assertion that the title still hold the flame for photojournalism in the UK.

Here, the editor-in-chief has the power, the art director calls the shots as to who’s commissioned, and the photo editor is reduced to a gofer. The result is dull, homogonous magazines and an unsustainable market for photographers.

One issue I have with Floyd's analysis is when he says Britain doesn't have a magazine culture. Clearly it does, but the heady days of the 1980s and 90s is over, and I see very few magazines worldwide that excite me the way The Face et al did when I first started buying them more than two decades ago. As much as I admire the work ethic of US photo editors, most of the magazines they work for are still deeply conservative in outlook. Why, for instance, is W so rated?

But it’s not just the mainstream. New independents seem to ditch their ideals as soon as they get a Dolce & Gabbana ad and quickly develop into second-rate fashion rags.

If magazines are going to survive the onslaught of their online competitors, they need to go back to basics and deliver compelling writing and photography, matched with inspirational design and vision.

Next week I’m going to the launch of a magazine that’s bucking the trend with a 76-odd page photo essay. I’ll report back on that, but in the meantime check Dispatches.

An interesting article on Flickr superstar, Icelandic photographer Rebekka Guoleifsdottir in the New York Times



There's an interesting take on Rebekka Guoleifsdottir and the Flickr phenomena in the New York Times today. Virginia Heffernan writes that Flickr's predominant aesthetic is that of heavy contrast post-production, and uses Guoleifsdottir's story to illustrate how this has become self-perpetuating, finishing with a funny story about someone posing as Henri Cartier-Bresson... Read it and weep.

Mexican suitcase update: Further insight into the rediscovery of Robert Capa's Spanish Civil War photos



Here's an interesting update on the tale of the recently 'discovered' Mexican Suitcase, written by Trisha Ziff.

Photo festival highlights: Lodz 2007 pick 3




The real find last year was, however, Michal Cala, who I did follow up on, getting Bill Kouwenhoven, a regular freelance writer we use at BJP, to interview him:

The breakup of Soviet hegemony in Eastern Europe has led to the rediscovery of forgotten photographers who worked from the late 1940s to the 1990s. Far more is known about the pre-war photographers and the post-Communist generation than about the many talented photographers working under relatively austere circumstances and in the isolation imposed by Cold War era travel restrictions and censorship of Western publications.

One recent rediscovery is the Polish photographer Michal Cala of Walbrzych, previously the Waldenburg or 'Forest Castle', of Silesia, a former industrial area best known for coal mining that changed hands from German to Polish control after the borders were shifted in the wake of World War II. Despite two publications and inclusion in several museum collections in western Europe, Cala has been almost completely unknown. But the power and beauty of his elegiac images of the industrial landscapes around Walbrzych made him a standout discovery of this year's Fotofestiwal, held in Lodz, Poland.



Cold War isolation
Michal Cala was born in Torun in 1948 and studied aircraft construction in Warsaw at the University of Technology in the early 1970s. Curiously, Czech-born Josef Koudelka, whose much later work from Silesia echoes Cala's, also studied aeronautical engineering. Cala became interested in painting and then photography, making 'journalist-like' images of Warsaw's streets and of the mountains of Poland, an abiding interest from his youth. From 1974 to 1983 he worked as an engineer in various companies in Silesia, and began photographing in the area.

In 1977, he moved to Tychy in Upper Silesia and with friends formed KRON, an association of local photographers, which had numerous small exhibitions and took part in photography contests. Six years later, he was accepted into the ZPAF - the Union of Polish Art Photographers. ZAPF made it possible for him to partake in national exhibitions and, during the most difficult economic times of the 1970s and 1980s, provided an umbrella with materials and darkrooms for working photographers.



By 1984, Cala had turned professional and photographed industrial and natural landscapes for Polish photo magazines such as Fotografia and Foto, as well as Architectura. These works were commissioned by the local authorities and financed his everyday life. It was during this time that he began his great project, simply entitled Slask or Silesia.

Poland's isolation during the Cold War imposed very difficult conditions on photographers. Distribution of western publications was controlled, as was access to photographic materials. As Cala points out, though, some Czech and Polish magazines did publish Western photographers such as Ansel Adams, Edward Weston, Henri Cartier-Bresson, Bill Brandt, Robert Frank, Walker Evans, and Diane Arbus. Western films, especially the socially critical films of British cinema's 'Angry Young Men' Lindsay Anderson and Tony Richardson were popular.



In addition, Cala was able to study Polish, Czech and Lithuanian photographers. 'I was inspired by landscape photography masters, namely Edward Hartwig, Pawel Pierscinski, Edward Poloczek and Andrzej Koniakowski, who photographed Silesia,' he says. 'And the great master of surrealistic, but also documentary and social photography, Zofia Rydet.'

Cala's photography, especially his most graphic images, fit in with what the Polish called 'fotografia kreacyjna' (creating/ creative photography), a movement inspired by surrealism. This movement paralleled what is more commonly seen as avant-garde photography, inspired by conceptualism. But Cala's work is also informed by the 1960s and 70s tradition of classic reportage photography too. He defines himself as partaking of the landscape, reportage, and social documentary streams of Polish photography, and this is clearly evident in Slask.



Under the governments of Wladyslaw Gomulka and Edward Gierek, political and material conditions were tough. Cala used Polish and East German films, and Polish papers and chemistry. His camera was a 35mm Exa, a simplified version of an Exacta made by Ihagee in Dresden, fitted with lenses from Carl Zeiss in Jena. Cala also had a car, which relatively few people did.

With the rise of Solidarity and the threat of Soviet invasion in 1980-81, political controls were greatly tightened. It became more difficult for Cala to work, and he faced run-ins with the Militia on several occasions. 'During the martial law period I wasn't victimised in any way,' he says, 'although at the beginning we were not allowed to travel and I had to stop photographing Silesia. I could have been arrested as a spy.'

On one occasion he was arrested and jailed overnight, and his film confiscated. Fortunately the roll taken was a new one - the exposed rolls remained in his car, which, fortunately, was not searched. Earlier in his career he had had to make a quick get away when he was spotted photographing abandoned railway stations, a highly illegal act in those days. His association with ZPAF must have helped protect him, and he did continue to get jobs during this difficult period. He also managed to get his exhibitions reviewed in newspapers operating under Party control.



King Coal
Cala became relatively well known in Poland, but he is still little-known in the West, despite the fact that his work bears comparison with masters such as Bill Brandt and Robert Frank. As with Brandt and Frank's work on Welsh miners in the 1930s and 1960s, Cala is able to synthesise social documentary work with a telling eye for graphic detail and composition.

His work was rooted the Silesian landscape. 'It was, especially in those times, very dramatic,' he has written. 'Labourers' housing areas with lots of children playing outdoors were situated next to steel factories or gigantic slag heaps, looking like Egyptian pyramids. I saw such things in Walbrzych and I simply decided that this is going be the theme of my photography.'

As he realised it is an amazing landscape, and for those who haven't grown up in an industrial region it is both magnificent and horrific. Cala depicted the super-human scale of Communist industrialisation, but the scenes are familiar to anyone who knows factory towns be they in Pittsburgh or Essen or Wales. The work was murderous whether under Capitalism or Communism, the human cost uncountable.

But despite this, Cala, like W. Eugene Smith or Josef Koudelka, was able to find a lyrical beauty in the darkness. The perfectly formed slagheaps glisten in snowy scenes, or form diamond-sharp graphic shapes. In one photograph a swan glides across the cooling pond of a power plant, the belching stacks of which are mirrored in the placid and undoubtedly toxic water. In another, birches shimmer in a weak sun before a range of toxic waste.

Humanity, too, is seen in Cala's work, and the resulting images have an otherworldly quality. Tiny people, the workers in the workers' state, exist in the shadows of massive factories. Children play in the streets or walk to school. Cars curve their way past the massive factories. Great cooling towers loom over houses, whose windows reflect almost supernaturally in uncertain light.

Cala's eye for detail makes his images starkly beautiful yet they combine, as he described it, the formal with the social. The result is extraordinarily powerful, and its been applied to other projects too. He's explored the area of Galicia, further south in Poland, in colour, and he also photographed other regions of Silesia. This work is markedly more romantic that the formally austere yet beautiful images from Walbrzych.



Post communism
Walbrzych, like Poland in generally, has changed dramatically since 1990. Communism has gone, as has the Solidarity movement. The current government, run by the Kaczynski twins, grapples with merging tradition with modernity and globalisation. The massive industrial works of Walbrzych have long since been shuttered and, in some cases, converted into art spaces. The city has been rebranded, and is now one of Poland's greenest cities and a burgeoning tourist centre. Cala's document is a testimony to a non-vanished moment in time.

Cala has been recognised in Poland as one of the country's best 20th Century photographers, and his work is included in a group exhibition, Polish Photography in 20th Century. The show has travelled in Poland and Lithuania and may continue on to London and Brussels. His recognition in the West is long overdue, and makes me wonder what else remains to be 'discovered'. How many other Michal Calas are still in the East, waiting to be found? We are lucky, at least, to have him.

Photo festival highlights: Lodz 2007 pick2

I was also much taken by the work of a young Finnish photographer an filmmaker, Tuomo Raino, who showed me his images on an iPod, which was a first.